Whole Truth Coalition

Click here for more information …

COTO Report and Megan Kargher are pleased to bring you a special two day interview with Freeman of freemantv, the freeman perspective and the free zone
http://www.youtube.com/user/Freemantv…
http://thefreemanperspective.blogspot…

http://freemantv.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6JLgar45sU

‘I am asking that the Irish people unite, as our forefathers did, and take to the streets at 11am Saturday 27th from Wood Quay Dublin, to voice our anger and concern over the actions of our politicians and what is happening to Ireland.’ -  Jim Corr

In an appalling yet sadly not unexpected decision, Keir Starmer the Director for Public Prosecutions, announced yesterday that no one would face charges over the death of Ian Tomlinson.

Tomlinson, a newspaper vendor, was on his way home on 1st April last year, when he fell foul of what can only be called a gang of police, ostensibly there to ’serve and protect’ the public during the G20 protests, and all too eager to mete out agression to any who crossed their path.

Anonymous for a very long time, PC Simon Harwood was caught on video striking Tomlinson and causing him to fall to the ground. Mr Tomlinson died later.

Harwood, in keeping it seems, with many police that day, had elected not to wear identifying insignia. This in itself made revealing him a very difficult task, and one cant help but wonder whether this wasn’t a large part of the motive for so doing.

He and his cohorts apparently steadfastly said nothing despite whatever limp attempts were going on within the police service to discover the culprit, and even after the video footage had come to light Harwood waited a further three days before coming forward to superiors.

The issue here is not merely one of the unnecessary death of a simple working man, although god knows that’s bad enough. It cuts to the core of our drift into a fascist police state, where despite video evidence and multiple witnesses, this officer it seems will not now even face a trial.

What message does this send to the rest of us? That we can forget about any kind of justice wherever misdeeds by the police are concerned. And perhaps more worryingly, what kind of message does it send to the police? Who will now surely look this as even greater Carte Blanche to dispense their own justice as the whim takes them, without a care that they will ever have to answer for their actions.

Clarity of the issue of the insignia and indeed the standing orders of the officer/s commanding that day are paramount. Who ordered that officers should attend without shoulder flash ID? Who ordered the Kettling? Who was in command?

The only chance we have of getting any of these vitally poignant questions answered is in court, under oath and cross-examination.

Accordingly then we MUST press hard for a volte face from the egregious Mr Starmer and DEMAND that PC Harwood stands trial for Mr Tomlinson’s death. Because otherwise, along with Tomlinson’s demise may well be the death of justice in this country and the birth of the Police State proper.

Justice for Ian Tomlinson: Petition

To:  The Director of Public Prosecutions

On the 1st April 2009 London played host to the G20 summit of the world’s most powerful nations. Regardless of whether or not you support the notion of Globalism, the right to peaceful protest should be entrenched in a lawful, peaceful and fair society, and until recently we had thought this was so in our British Isles.

The demonstrations against the G20 brought together people from all walks of life who simply wanted to show their opposition to the trend towards profit at any costs, riches for the few at the expense of the many. During most of the day those protests were good natured and friendly.
As the day wore on into evening however, the mood changed. The police began donning riot gear, despite little in the way of trouble beyond the suspiciously public few who had openly begun smashing bank windows, seemingly for the sole benefit of the assembled press.
The police then proceeded to ‘kettle’ the remaining protesters, a practice of hemming people in without the means to leave, and without access to water or toilet facilities. It has been said that this is a deliberate means by which to provoke an angry response to which the police can then react, thereby justify the heavy police presence and ‘robust’ policing.

Ian Tomlinson was not part of the demonstration in any way, and was simply making his way home through the area. He was assaulted by a police officer who, in the following days refused to come forward and admit his part, until video evidence emerged giving the lie to his silent denial of involvement. Despite this it was a further three days before the officer finally made himself known to superiors.
It’s interesting to note that he, in common with many of those policing the event, apparently were not wearing identifying insignia that day.
Mr Tomlinson died later that day.

Following his death there have been no less than three separate post mortems. The First, carried out by Home Office Pathologist Dr Freddie Patel, can be said to be unreliable even if only because of concerns that Mr Patel had blemished his own reputation: Following Mr Tomlinson’s death Mr Patel was removed from the Home Office register of accredited forensic pathologists pending an inquiry, amid concern into whether he has breached regulations.
It also emerged that the Metropolitan police alerted the Home Office to concerns about Patel’s performance in four suspicious death cases in 2004.

The second post mortem, carried out soon after the first at the behest of the Independent Police Complaints Commission, concluded that Mr Tomlinson died of internal bleeding, a verdict in keeping with the claim that his death was as a direct consequence of the assault on him.
The third was carried out on the orders of the legal team representing the officer seen in the video assaulting Mr Tomlinson.
Tellingly the results of this Post Mortem have not thus far been made public.

Today, 22nd July 2010, Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions has announced that no police officer will face any charges in connection with the Death of Ian Tomlinson, as he feels there is, �…no realistic prospect of a conviction.�

Well Mr Starmer that is unacceptable.
In a free, democratic and open society no one should be above the law, and so we the people DEMAND that the officer concerned be brought before a Court
and his guilt or innocence established openly, honestly and lawfully before a jury of his peers.

Sincerely,

Please sign the petition here Justice For Ian Tomlinson Petition and help spread the word far and wide.

Peace

Jonathan

I’m on my soapbox again about this Demon Banker… Emilio Botin (whom hereinafter shall be named Emilio BOTOX on account of the similarity to the poisonous bacteria that inhibits movement and induces paralysis… hmmm… very fitting)

This Spanish Banker (forfeit the B for a W and we’re closer to a more accurate description) is Illuminati through and through. My hubby did some research after their minions had been harrassing me on the telephone at all hours of the day and night, including over Christmas, because I missed ONE PAYMENT on my credit card in the 4 years I’ve used it! Turns out Botox’s daughter, Anna, attended a secret Bildeberg meeting in Greece over Christmas time 2009. It was held on a ’secret island in Greece’ and apparently, according to news reports on YouTube, anyone who approached the island who was not invited was immediately arrested and thrown in the clink!

I am now working on a short ‘movie’ to be aired on YouTube, which is a parody of the corporation, but I’m not laughing. There are plenty of others on there, but I want to add my voice too.

I know it’s like swimming through treacle right now, but we’re on the brink of a breakthrough. If we can just withdraw our services from these controlling b****rds and not give in to the fear factor, we will emerge triumphant.

During one of the phone calls from Satan’s little helpers, the Indian gentleman informed me (as he was speaking over me and obviously reading his script) that if I didn’t make an immediate payment, he had a duty to inform me that my credit rating ‘could be affected’… Suffice to say, I’m too much of a lady to repeat what I said back to him, but believe me, my Inner Fishwife raised her headscarf!!!

Keep up your efforts guys, and remember at all times, YOU ARE LOVED! Not by the ones who seek to control you, but by a much higher power…

Jay xxx

On the heels of a similar proposal being pushed in Copenhagen in the name of fighting global warming, the European Union has asked the IMF to introduce a global tax on financial transactions in order to fund more bailouts – in other words, the globalists are devising yet more ways to plunder the taxpayer into servitude to the private banks that they own.

“The European Union increased pressure on the International Monetary Fund on Friday to consider a global tax on financial transactions to limit the risk of another economic crisis,” reports the London Telegraph.

The EU wants a “global financial transaction levy” in order to “fund future financial bailouts,” as British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for during the G20.

This is nothing more than yet another veil for the global tobin tax that will be used to bankroll the system of world government that Brown, the EU and the IMF have incessantly called for and rapidly advanced on the back of the economic crisis.

Taxpayers in the European Union are already picking up the tab for the massive bailouts that have taken place over the past year in the form of higher taxes – now they are set to be financially raped further in the form of transaction taxes. Once the globalists get a foot in the door by taxing international transactions related to the financial industry, they will seek to expand the levy to cover all purchases. European citizens already pay such taxes domestically in the form of VAT (value added tax) on most purchases, which is set to revert back to 17.5 percent in the UK from January 1st.

So the globalists already take a huge chunk in tax from most purchases we make, they take another huge chunk in the form of higher taxes to pay for the bailouts that have already happened, and now they want to take another slice in the form of an international transaction tax – and this is before the raft of other taxes that are currently being readied in Copenhagen under the justification of the global warming fraud.

Read more…

Lord Christopher Monckton warns that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.

Speaking with The Alex Jones Show, Monckton, who is in Copenhagen attending the UN climate summit, said that when he attempted to obtain a copy of the current draft of the negotiating text agreement, he was initially rebuffed before he threatened an international diplomatic incident unless the document was forthcoming.

“I insisted and it took about 10 minutes and they consulted each other with three or four of them arguing over it – none of them would produce the document….I said I know this treaty exists because this is what the conference is all about,” said Monckton.

Only after Monckton threatened repercussions was he handed the the current draft of the treaty, and the details it contained are perhaps a clue as to why the UN officials were so keen to keep it under wraps.

“Once again they are desperately trying to conceal from everybody here the magnitude of what they’re attempting to do – they really are attempting to set up a world government,” said Monckton, adding that the word “government” was no longer used but the process of further centralization of power into global hands was clearly spelled out in the treaty.

Monckton said that the new world government outlined in the treaty would be handed powers to, “Tax the American economy to the extent of 2 percent GDP, to impose a further tax of 2 percent on every financial transaction….and to close down effectively the economies of the west, transfer your jobs to third world countries – all of that is still in the treaty draft.”

As the leaked document out of Copenhagen reported on by the London Guardian revealed yesterday, this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, but directly into the coffers of the World Bank.

“The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions,” reported the Guardian.

Read more…

The opening days of the Copenhagen climate-change conference have been rife with denials and—dare we say it?—deniers. American delegate Jonathan Pershing said the emails and files leaked from East Anglia have helped make clear “the robustness of the science.” Talk about brazening it out. And Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and so ex-officio guardian of the integrity of the science, said the leak proved only that his opponents would stop at nothing to avoid facing the truth of climate change. Uh-huh.

Mr. Pachauri and his allies are fond of pointing out that climate change science is bigger than East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), and that other institutions’ research backs the theory. This is true. But it’s also the best argument for opening up to public scrutiny both the raw data and the computer code that lies behind pronouncements of looming climate catastrophe. Citizen-researchers—some of whom are, indeed, skeptics—have been after some of this information for years. CRU’s apparent obstruction of freedom-of-information requests, as revealed by the leaks, is only the tip of the iceberg.

Read more…

‘How easy is it to hide £62 billion? That is the question that has been flummoxing the City today. For it transpires that last autumn, to the almost complete ignorance of most of the City (and, I admit, most of the journalists who, like myself, keep a pretty close eye on the UK economy), the Bank of England lent a staggering amount of cash to Royal Bank of Scotland and HBOS.’

Read more…

According to Sir Anthony Blunt, Lord Victor Rothschild recommended the notorious Cambridge Apostles, for intelligence and government jobs, and these introduction papers still exist in the archives. What has never come out though is that they all first worked for Rothschild.

During the Napoleonic Wars when the world’s two wealthiest nations, Britain and France were both bankrolled by the same Rothschild bank, Rothschild got news back to London on the outcome of the battle of Waterloo through his own intelligence network; enabling him to clean up on the stock exchange and take over Britain’s entire economy.

The Rothschilds and their intelligence network were also behind the push to get Britain into WW II; primarily to support the Rothschild controlled Soviet Union against Hitler’s Germany.

Remember, Rothschild confiscated the Czar’s huge wealth during the 1917 Russian Revolution when the Romanovs were cruelly murdered. The only man in Europe to stand up against Soviet expansion was Hitler, so many of our Royal family secretly supported him.

Read more… 

The Danish government has appointed a Trilateral Commission member to chair the United Nations Copenhagen climate change summit. Lykke Friis, the former pro-dean at Copenhagen University, will replace Connie Hedegaard (a Bilderberg member) who has been nominated for the post of the European Union’s first climate commissioner. Hedegaard’s nomination will be assessed by European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso, who last month announced the creation of the new role to oversee the EU’s plans to cut emissions 20 per cent by 2020 and thus undercut modern civilization in Europe.

Friis attended a Trilateral meeting in 2005. “Lykke Friis is member of several committees and councils, for instance the Board of Sport Event Denmark, the Trilateral Commission, and the Council of the Danish Atlantic Treaty Association. She is also responsible for organizing the Research Congress on Climate Change in 2009,” a Zoom Info entry states.

The Danish Atlantic Treaty Association works with NATO and the Atlantic Treaty Association, an atlanticist organization (connected to the Bilderberg Group and the Council on Foreign Relations) consisting of the Atlantic Councils of NATO. The current president of the Atlantic Treaty Association is Robert Hunter, a senior adviser at the RAND Corporation, chairman of the Council for a Community of Democracies (supported by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund), and a consultant for the death merchant Lockheed Martin.

Read more…

The Copenhagen conference on climate change at the beginning of next month seeks to, according to its creators, “reach a new global accord to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to curb emissions of greenhouse gases”. UN-front man Ban Ki-Moon remarked at a preparation speech on the road to Copenhagen that “sooner or later there will be a higher price on carbon – imposed either by policy or by market forces.” All this just rolls off the tongs of these transnationalist as if they are whistling a tune while tending their garden. If there was no such thing as historic fact, it would sound noble, urgent, and necessary. Unfortunately, we know precisely what motivates the initiators of this global effort: profit, absolute control and- I almost forgot- depopulation of the world’s inhabitants. This garden the elite is cultivating is by no means a place of joy. It stinks of rotten weeds and dead foliage.

In this first of several articles, I set out to identify the blueprint of modern day eugenics and its intimate ties to the environmental movement. In fact, the more one researches this union, forged in the blood of millions in the last century, the more one realises that the anthropogenic global warming swindle is not just tied to eugenics. It is eugenics.

In 1968 a think-tank emerged out of the back alleys of the face-lifted eugenics movement called the Club of Rome. Nurtured from its very conception as a beacon of light to which all environmentalist ships should navigate, its creators knew that the green movement they had set out to create, was designed to blame man for the supposed predicament the earth was in. As a consequence the number of people should be reduced lest the earth crumble under his crushing weight. The only thing to be done, so argued the Club, was for a global body of power to enforce depopulation goals as decided upon by the global elite.

Of what people does this global elite consist? Well just google ‘Club of Rome members’ and compare the names on the membership lists with those on the list of attendants of the annual Bilderberg conferences and you will discover the very same cast of characters, setting up the rules in the New World Order. You’ll find Al Gore, David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, and all the other enemies of all free humanity and their cronies.

Read more…

‘A secret court is seizing the assets of thousands of elderly and mentally impaired people and turning control of their lives over to the State - against the wishes of their relatives. The draconian measures are being imposed by the little-known Court of Protection, set up two years ago to act in the interests of people suffering from Alzheimer’s or other mental incapacity.

The court hears about 23,000 cases a year - always in private - involving people deemed unable to take their own decisions. Using far-reaching powers, the court has so far taken control of more than £3.2billion of assets.’

Read more…

‘THE state-owned Royal Bank of Scotland is planning to hand out record bonuses of up to £5m each in a snub to struggling taxpayers. The average employee in its high-risk investment banking arm is likely to take home £240,000, with the top 20 staff in line for payments of between £1m and £5m.

The payouts by the investment banking division — from a total pay and bonus pot of £4 billion — would top the deals awarded at the peak of the financial boom in 2007 and are 66% higher than those paid last year. RBS, then headed by Sir Fred Goodwin, had to be rescued from collapse by the Treasury last October with an initial injection of £20 billion. The taxpayer now has a 70% stake in the bank.’

Read more…

The UK has promised an extra $11bn of standby finance for the IMF, which will be used to support countries that are struggling in the face of the economic crisis.

This sum, on top of the initial $15bn pledged in spring could be drawn on within months since the IMF’s original war chest is understood to be close to running dry after it has had to come to the rescue of various countries, including Iceland and Pakistan.

Read more…

In other words: Don’t Ever Be Threatened

Pondering the enormous credit card bills coming into our house, my husband and I were working out how we could reduce or even eliminate this monkey on our backs.

Not that we are not grateful for having had what we called our ‘Plan B’ in that when times were lean, we had the credit cards to lean on.  Then we realised that there is a whole insidious organisation dedicated to luring vulnerable people into its clutches. Credit cards got us out of trouble and helped us to pay for things when my husband’s business was in its fledgling state, and now we have money coming in and are able to fly on our own, the credit card debt is weighing us down.

Now, neither of us has any qualms about paying for the things we’ve had. What is crippling for us and for many others in the same position, is the enormous amount of interest that goes on at the end of the month. When we thought about that and looked at what this interest actually is, we realised that it is, in effect, non-money. It is an amount that they company has decided they will make you pay for the privilege of having given you their ‘help’. When you look into the ways in which the financial systems are run, you begin to realise you are dealing with no less than financial paedophiles!

These people groom their victims into a false sense of security and when the chips are down, they pull the rug from under you. They make out like they are your friend and then they play ‘good cop, bad cop’. I call these parasites Financial Paedophiles. I do not think this is too strong a description when you look at how these people operate. A paedophile will groom vulnerable people into taking rewards and nice things in order that they can have their needs met, and get you to do what they want you to do. When you try to say ‘no’ or to express your inability to do what they want you to do, they tell you that you are bad, dirty, disgusting, etc, and they threaten your safety and livelihood. The Financial and Banking System grooms vulnerable people into taking rewards and nice things in order that they can have their needs met, and get you to do what they want you to do. Then, when they have you in their clutches, and you begin to feel uncomfortable and don’t want to do what they want you to do anymore, and in fact you can’t afford to carry on paying the price, they tell you that you are a bad person and they threaten your safety and your livelihood.

Not a lot of difference there then, eh?
Being a good person means having a lot of credit, paying massive amounts of interest and owning a home and mortgage (more credit). You are even better if you have a car on HP, and your home is filled with all the latest technology – paid for by credit cards and loans.

You are a bad person if you default on any of these so-called credit agreements. You are not allowed to change the rules, but they are. You cannot charge them interest if they accidentally get it wrong sometimes, which they do. But if you overstep your mark, you bet they will make you pay big time. And they do!

Just this week I have had another example of the Financial Paedophile in action. I decided after some stressful communications with Paypal, to just ignore them and not use them again. The attempts to get to a human being with any sense and with any authority rendered me a gibbering wreck, and in an attempt to save my sanity, I decided to just let it all go and find another provider of the service. I buy and sell things on Ebay, and so far at least that outlet has proven reliable. I had a look round and found something called ‘Nochex’ – an international merchant service.

I spoke to a very nice young man called Liam who proceeded to stroke my ego, soothe my wounded pride and generally tell me he would go away and speak to his ‘line manager’ and get back to me if I qualified for an account with them. Guess what? I qualified. A day later, the same young man with the demeanour of a friendly puppy, called me personally to joyfully inform me that I’d been honoured with an account. And then came the punch in the nose… ‘the setup fee is just £50 and once we receive that we can get you up and running, Mrs A’…

I gasped and told the young man I couldn’t afford the fee right now, as Paypal had stuffed me and not paid me my fees, and also because at the moment I just do not have £50 to throw at something I consider should be free (at least in their favour Paypal don’t charge a startup fee). He seemed a little perturbed at this but he did accept that I would need a couple of days to think about it. I wondered why this hadn’t been mentioned in our original conversation but didn’t ask at the time.

The next day, an email arrived from my (by now, somewhat less friendly) friend Liam offering me a one-off, goodwill gesture discount of half price setup fee for £25. He seemed to be entirely missing the point that my reason for not wanting to deal with Paypal was not simply that I couldn’t speak to a human being unless I’d negotiated the labyrinthine automated switchboard, but that they had been unfair in my dealings with me. I was not about to embark upon the same journey, albeit in a different vehicle, with another Rip-Off Merchant!

He was upset by my questioning, for example, “Why didn’t you simply offer me the setup fee of £25 in the first place? I was honest with you. Could you not have exercised the same courtesy?”

His answer was to send me an email, listing all the other providers and their fees and it felt, to me, objectionable. Here is the answer:

Hi Jay

Every other provider will charge a start up fee.

For example, WorldPay charge £200 and the monthly fees of £20 plus 4.5% per transaction.

Netbank charge £100 and monthly fees of £20.

PayPoint/SecPay/Metacharge go in at £125!

Protx/SagePay is a payment gateway and requires you to have a bank merchant account (with monthly fees).

We charge a one-off fee with a gesture of goodwill discount – has anyone else been as generous?

We are the most competitive by some distance. I’ll leave it with you.

Kind Regards
Liam

The bit that wrinkled my nose was the ‘has anyone else been as generous?’ bit. Now, this lad cannot have been more than about 25-30 (my estimation, based on the fact that they like to get ‘em young). He is being groomed himself, into becoming his own worst nightmare. And he’s good at it. But not THAT good. He didn’t hook ME in!

It is more and more evident to me that these people are no different in their dealings than paedophiles. The reason I use the term is because when you think of the word PAEDOPHILE it disgusts you. It does me anyway. It is a term for something nasty. My grandfather was one, so I know first hand how they operate.

And I already know that when I begin complaining about the financial system and its behaviours, some clever old Richard Cranium out there will piously point out to me the error of my ways. ‘If you didn’t do this, that or t’other, you would be like me. A fine, upstanding citizen who never puts a foot wrong. Never been in debt in my life (oh? I own my house? A mortgage… well, that’s acceptable debt… blah de blah)

Nah you’re probably right mate. And you’re probably one of them there paedophiles – they often love to be seen as pillars of the community and above all blame and wrongdoing.

I haven’t finished my rant, and fully intend to do something positive about it. I am hosting a Wholistic Festival in Llangollen (with my friend and co-organiser, Karen) in September (19th and 20th if you’re interested!) and I want to get people together to sign some sort of petition that we can use as the basis for even bigger action. Not simply to get something done, as I don’t think we will at this stage, but simply to make me (and them) feel better. If you feel more empowered, then you won’t ever allow this piss-potical, Financial Paedophile system to abuse you any further.

Anyone who is interested in getting together with me on this, please contact me. I need your support!

Thanks for listening… Jay xxx

The agenda to eliminate cash is real and it’s coming to a store near you.  The perils of a cashless society make the valueless currency system we have now appear a panacea.  Already many must pay extra fees in order to pay their bills in cash.  The day is not so far off when even going to the store for a soda will be an entirely electronic transaction.  There will be no buying and selling permitted that is not electronic.

 As things stand today if there is a problem with a person’s credit card/PIN card they can always pay the bill in cash, or can they? 

 It was my recent experience while travelling in one of my favourite cities that having cash was not enough to buy food at the market of my choice.  I came across what looked like quite a nice supermarket on a street I had never ridden my bike down before and decided to buy some food for breakfast the next day.  When I entered what I saw was perhaps the nicest selection and quality of food I had ever seen in the city of Amsterdam, excepting one organic open market (only open Saturdays.)  I proceeded to do my shopping with great joy, looking forward to sampling the beautiful organic products on sale.  Awaiting me at the counter however was a shock, cash is not accepted at this store.  I would have to pay for my food electronically if I wanted it.  Normally on principle I would not have bought the food but, as I happened to have a credit card with me, (which is rare,) I decided to see for myself if it was really better quality than what I could buy with cash.  The sad truth is yes, it was better than much of what is available for cash and is amongst the best food for sale in Holland. 

 Considering the fact that I have travelled to almost 100 cities in more than 25 countries, on 5 continents the cashier’s contention that the company she worked for was cashless to prevent armed hold-ups is laughable.  There were only some 200 incidents of cash theft including snatch and grab as well as hold-ups in the Dutch supermarkets last year.  In a country with thousands of supermarkets which cater to a population of over 16 million, that is a very low percentage of armed robbery.  I have seen violent places and central Amsterdam is not one of them.  This is not the sort of business located in the red light district or even open late.  The fact is this business is located in a very affluent area of Amsterdam which I would consider safe at any hour of the day or night.

Under the guise of protecting people, what this cashless rule does very well is keep quality food out of the hands of the poor and the illegal immigrants.  It also allows the company, the bank and the government to know just what it is you buy every day.  

Supermarkets in the Netherlands planning on eliminating cash transactions by 2014.  What happens on the day markets around the world sell only electronically?  What happens on that day when your card is declined?  How many more rights will people concede for the perception of security?  A cashless society does not equal security, it is slavery.  Those who control the electronic money will then effectively control every aspect of a person’s physical survival including where a person may live, who eats and who does not.   A cashless society will allow those who control the electronic monetary system to decide weather you live or die.  At least with the current system when the when the money is devalued to less than the cost of the paper it is printed on you can still use it as tinder.

Electronic money is an even bigger scam than the paper money backed by nothing which we currently have.  Say no to having every aspect of your daily life electronically recorded.  Say no to a society run on electronic money by refusing to support stores which do not accept cash.  Say no by using cash or better yet bartering when and where possible.  If we just go along with the new electronic monetary system the consequences will likely be disastrous.  The time to choose what sort of economic system you want to live under is today, before the choice is made for you.  Act now and make your voice heard.

 footnotes:

Instead of the usual footnotes I am listing all the researchers, filmmakers and authors who pointed me in the direction of the information above and not only those whose work would normally be referenced in direct conjunction with the information in this article.  These footnotes are not only an acknowledgment of the scholarship of the people listed below but are also a sincere thanks for their contributions towards the education of all humanity.

thank you:

Max Igan, David Icke, Aaron Russo, Ben Stewart, Anthony J Hilder

Special thanks to my friend Jonathan at KnowTheLies.com, who helped me edit this essay.

 by Megan ‘Verb’ Kargher

It is August and in a small town on the South Coast of France the holiday season is in full swing, but it is raining so there is not too much business happening and everyone is heavily in debt.

Fortunately, a rich Russian tourist arrives in the foyer of the small local hotel. He asks for a room and puts a Euro100 note on the reception counter as a deposit. He takes the key and goes to inspect the room located up the stairs on the third floor.

The hotel owner takes the banknote in a hurry and rushes to his meat supplier to whom he owes E100. The butcher takes the money and races to his supplier to pay his debt. The wholesaler rushes to the farmer to pay E100 for pigs he purchased some time ago.

The farmer triumphantly gives the E100 note to a local prostitute who gave him her services on credit. The prostitute goes quickly to the hotel, as she was owing the hotel for her hourly room use to entertain clients.

At that moment, the rich Russian is coming down to reception and informs the hotel owner that the proposed room is unsatisfactory, takes his E100 back and departs.

There was no profit or income. But everyone no longer has any debt and the small townspeople look optimistically towards their future.

COULD THIS BE THE SOLUTION TO THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRUNCH?

Reclaiming Our Sovereignty

Once again, we have reached a crossroads in our history. We are confronted with an enemy that would destroy our nation and its people. We have some hard decisions to make - each of us, individually. Are you prepared to make them?

The British Constitution Group’s call for Lawful Rebellion now moves up a notch and our campaign ‘Wanted – 1 million rebellious Britons’ has commenced, to be formally declared at our conference in London on the 13th June.

If you share our ambition to take back control of our country, then we need your commitment and attendance at this conference, at which we will outline our strategy to build our campaign into a force to be reckoned with.

There is a national mood for rebellion shared by patriots the length and breadth of the country. This must be harnessed under a single campaign with carefully defined objectives in order to win the war to claim back our sovereign right to govern ourselves.

Make no mistake about it, this is a war.

Fought by our enemies (within this country) with the weapons of lies, deceit, subterfuge and betrayal, their aim is to destroy the prinicple of the nation state, and replace it with regionalised global dictatorship. In order to win, we must be prepared to tell the truth about our plight to fellow Britons, the majority of whom exist in an awareness vacuum or a state of abstract denial.

We cannot go to war without an army and ‘Wanted – 1 million rebellious Britons’ is the foundation to building that army. We know that millions of our fellow countrymen and women share our views but most have been rendered impotent, convinced that there is nothing that we (the majority) can do to challenge the authority of a duplicitous minority.

Our task is to cajole, encourage, persuade, prod, push and insist that the nation rally to our cause and sign up to lawful rebellion as the only means by which we can now take back control of our country.

An honest majority can impose their will, peacefully and lawfully,  on the dishonest minority - if they have the collective will to do so. It is our challenge, indeed our duty, to rally the nation around this cause.

We need ordinary Britons in their masses to unite behind our campaign. We need to invoke our Constitution, restate our right to govern ourselves and educate a dumbed-down populous to the reality of their virtual enslavement - a harsh fact that few will recognise or are prepared to accept as true despite overwhelming evidence.

We are over-regulated, over-taxed, spied on, burdened by bureaucracy and political correctness, to the extent that we are even told the words and phrases that we can and cannot utter. Thieves, muggers and drug dealers escape with meaningless cautions, whilst the law abiding majority are fined and harassed by a militia-like officialdom who themselves take orders from compliant and controlled strata of middle mangers with an inflated sense of self-importance, hand-picked for their enthusiasm for social engineering and their busy-body mentality.

These people must be challenged; made to realise that they are working to an agenda  of destruction, in which moral values are abandoned, families devalued and society fragmented and manipulated. Whilst we are all caught up and distracted in the chaos so inflicted, the way is clear for the power elites to build their edifice from which they can look down and control us.

Each one of us should know and take heart that we are pushing back the tide of deceit. The elite’s plans are exposed - never before has the collective political establishment (the puppets of the elite) been so despised and distrusted.

We know our enemies’ strengths and we know they are enormously powerful, but we also know their weaknesses. We know that ultimately our power once harnessed is much greater than theirs. Our power so harnessed is their greatest fear.

Our power comes from our numbers and our ability to funnel these into a single campaign with the objective of taking back control. Our ability to harness this power comes from our preparedness to tell the truth about our predicament, to alert the wider public and fire their passion for freedom and true democracy. They know they are being conned by a dishonest and self-serving elite, they just need to know that there is a way in which they can be empowered. We must offer the direction and inspiration for others to follow. It is up to YOU to carry that message to the wider audience.

Do you have the courage to do so?

If you are willing to play a part in reclaiming our national sovereignty then you will need to grasp the truth of the situation, which is that the three main political parties are controlled by a global elite… whose agenda will not be disrupted one iota by elections, no matter who wins. The Brown, Cameron, Clegg show is just that… a play in which the actors create an illusion that they are in charge, but in reality it is the directors behind the scenes, hidden from our view, who are firmly in control and who will not be revealed to us until the final curtain falls – by which time it will be too late.

We are calling for our Constitution to be reinstated and our laws to be upheld, but even these are useless in the face of tyranny and oppression – ultimately they require the people to stand up and defend them.

Sign up to our pledge today.

Become a First Point of Contact.

Set up your local group.

Organise your local community.

Do it.

Do it today.

Help us turn this tide.

We the British people have a right to govern ourselves, but that right can only be enforced by the people themselves.

The British Constitution Group

Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, is considering extending a £15 surcharge for victims to those handed on-the-spot fines and fixed penalties.

Currently the extra payment is only added on to fines handed out by the courts, but any extension to fixed penalties would pave the way for millions of people including speeding drivers to be hit as well.

The current minimum fine of £60 would then be increased to £75 under the move, which is being examined by the Ministry of Justice and being discussed by magistrates.

The Victim’s Surcharge was introduced in April 2007 and latest figures show between April 2008 and January this year it raised more than £6.6 million.

But that figure would be dwarfed if it were extended to fines handed out away from the courts.

Last year, some 3.06 million drivers were handed fixed penalties for speeding alone while more than 207,500 on-the-spot fines were handed out in 2007 - the most recent statistics - for those guilty of minor disorder such as graffiti or drunk and disorderly as well as for shoplifting and cannabis possession.

Read more…