Whole Truth CoalitionWhole Truth CoalitionWhole Truth CoalitionWhole Truth CoalitionWhole Truth Coalition
FREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTH
FREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTHFREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTHFREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTHFREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTHFREEING YOUR MIND TO THE TRUTH - THE WHOLE TRUTH
A squad of anti-litter officials has been given instructions to film suspects on the street - even before they have done anything wrong.
The team of 11′ environmental enforcement officers’ has been equipped with mobile phone cameras and told to use them to film people they think may be about to drop litter.
The use of cameras to record individuals who have committed no crime or offence has generated a row over the spying powers of local councils and the growing willingness of officials to stretch them to the limit.
Ministers have already called on town halls to stop abusing the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which has allowed councils to watch those suspected of trying to cheat on school catchment areas, those thought to be wrongly parking with blue disabled badges and families who officials think are putting their bins out on the wrong day.
Litter police are employed by councils under environmental laws passed three years ago that allow officials to hand out onthespot fines to those who drop litter or break wheelie bin regulations.
The litter squad equipped to film suspects has been employed by Hackney Council in North London.
The team’s members have been involved in a number of controversial incidents. Officials have been reported chasing suspects on foot through traffic to capture them on camera and to have invaded a cafe while looking for a woman suspected of dropping a cigarette end.
What is the definition of a Conspiracy Theory? Wikipedia definition here, Another definition of “Conspiracy Theory” from Webster’s Online Dictionary:
” A conspiracy theory is the belief that historical or current events are the result of manipulations by one or more secretive powers or conspiracies.”
Where on Earth might one hear of such a paranoid idea? How about from President John F. Kennedy?
Or how about President Eisenhower? Watch this segment of the entire Eisenhower farewell below:
Demonstrations against the killing were seen in cities across the continent with left-wing radicals and other sympathisers taking to the streets.
In Spain, 11 protesters were arrested and several police officers injured when clashes took place in Madrid and Barcelona.
In Copenhagen, 32 people were arrested when their protest in support of the Greek protests turned violent.
In neighbouring Turkey, about a dozen left-wing protesters daubed red paint over the front of the Greek consulate in Istanbul.
Around 150 people belonging to a Danish underground movement took to the streets, throwing bottles and paint bombs at buildings, police cars and officers. In Moscow and Rome, protesters threw petrol bombs at Greece’s embassies.
Journalists came under attack for the first time in the riots, with a Russian news crew assaulted by a mob of about 50 youths, some of them reportedly drunk.
It came to me as something of a surprise to learn that the German authorities and their Zionist puppet masters allowed me to remain online until Monday, December 1. So much so, that I could not resist writing one final article, one final shout aimed at the Zionist-Bolshevik takeover of the world we, as children of my generation, once knew as fertile soil for dissent and freedom.
America has just elected an avowed Marxist, aligned with the principles of British Fabianism, to be their president for at least the next four years. McCain would have been no different; for the Zionists and the State of Israel, who control America, stacked their cards to ensure for themselves a satisfactory outcome either way.
We in the European Soviet Union have become accustomed to the gradualism of a Jewish-Freemasonic dominated socialist bureaucracy that stifles freedom of speech and imprisons truth tellers as a matter of course under various strictures aimed at those brave enough to challenge historical orthodoxy and the Zionist manipulation of the usurious banking and financial system. On account of our weakness and cowardice to resist the encroachments upon our liberties, we are now easy prey for the Satanic elites who govern us by decree from Brussels.
At a whim, they haul us before their judicial synagogues in the same fashion as the Spanish Inquisition. No jury. No admissible defence. No escape from Gulag Europa. Case closed.
THE growth of public spending under Labour has created a generation of “Soviet” boroughs where half the population is dependent on the state for work.
An analysis of official figures has shown 10 areas where more than 40% of the workforce is employed in the public sector.
Increased reliance on the state has come with the failure to develop new industries to replace mining and manufacturing.
Topping the league is Castle Morpeth, Northumberland, where the state provides 57% of jobs. Even this understates public sector dominance - the town is a dormitory for HM Revenue and Customs offices 10 miles away that employ 6,000 people.
The northeast dominates the “Soviet” league, drawn up by the Centre for Economics and Business Research. Whitehall has located agencies there to soak up unemployment caused by the decline of manufacturing and mining.
Chris Grayling, shadow work and pensions secretary, said: “The government has let Britain slip down the competitiveness league with the result that, in towns like this, the private sector has become a minor part of the local economy.” Five miles from Morpeth is Wansbeck, the second most state-dominated borough in Britain with 47.5% employed by the state.
Other such areas include Hastings in East Sussex, Ceredigion in west Wales and Inverclyde, west of Glasgow.
Richard Dodds, a farmer and Conservative councillor on Castle Morpeth borough and Northumberland councils, said: “I produce wheat and cattle but there are a lot of people who produce absolutely nothing.
We have received word from “Stop Common Purpose“ that they have identified Barack Obama, not as a Socialist or as a Communist, but as a Communitarian. This statement may require further explanation.
First of all, let’s jog our memory what is Common Purpose. In case of a total blank on the reader’s part we can best refer you to our dossier on the subject. This nefarious, Sorosian fifth column - CP, for short - has its tentacles all over Britain where it is quietly subverting all walks of life without so much as a by your leave. It is rapidly expanding globally.
CP, rooted in the early history of mass psychology and in the British Labour Party, stands for a new, post-democratic, borderless world order, also known as Transnational Progressivism. Stop CP’s home page and their page on CP’s philosophy explain the matter in detail. This organization is beyond the Marxist/Fascist, Left/Right dichotomy. They are far worse: CP is Pragmatically collectivist and the collective is … the world.
Those who assure themselves that all is well and that the New World Order is just a conspiracy theory pursued by unhinged paranoids can disabuse themselves of the illusion here and now by reading Glenn Beck’s transcript of UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s recent statements on the international financial crisis, which gives world leaders in his opinion an unique opportunity to establish the global society.
A young woman has been found hanged in Bridgend, taking the toll of suicides by young people in the area to 24 since the start of last year.
Another 23 young people aged 15 to 27 have been found hanged in the borough of Bridgend since the start of 2007.
But South Wales police say there is no link between the deaths.
A spokesman said: “We were called to a report of a sudden death of a 25 year old woman in Bridgend. The death is not being treated as suspicious. A file is being compiled on behalf of the coroner.
“There are clearly similarities between recent sudden deaths in Bridgend but we can confirm our investigations have by no means uncovered any criminal evidence that links them.”
Please look at these words and take in the meanings for these are the words of slavery.
Constitution: The fundamental law, written or unwritten, that establishes the character of a government by defining the basic principles to which a society must conform.
Statute; A legislative rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed, an established law or rule, as of a corporation.
From neuter of Latin Status: Law the; legal character or condition of a person or thing:
Enforced by: Statutory instruments and using statutory penalties.
Society; In the civil law, by society is meant a partnership, a society is a number of persons united together by mutual consent, in order to deliberate, determine, and act jointly for some ‘common purpose’.
Law; A rule of conduct or procedure established by custom, agreement, or authority.
Legislative; Of or relating to the enactment of laws.
Statutory: Created, defined, or relating to a statute; required by statute; conforming to a statute.
Instrument; a written legal document such as a contract, lease, deed, will or bond
Penalty; Something, especially a sum of money, required as a forfeit for an offense.
Forfeit; Something surrendered or subject to surrender as punishment for a breach of contract.
A statutory penalty, for example, is punishment in the form of a fine, prison sentence, or both, that is imposed against an offender for committing some statutory violation.
People of certain persuasion say that we must always live in a ‘society’ with a constitution written or un-written; persons united together by mutual consent, in order to deliberate, determine, and act jointly for some ‘common purpose’, a partnership that requires consent from all parties.
A partnership with a ‘common purpose’ for a ‘society’; the socially dominant members of a ‘community’.
The constitutional (statute) law of this country and the society that we have been forced to live in, has been created over hundreds of years with the manipulation of statute law. Simply to fool the people into giving their consent to law that is, specifically designed, to extract money from them to maintain the ‘rule makers’ social dominance. Their legal fictitious standing in a society they have created, that is only beneficial to that fictitious dominant element. A false partnership that only works one way built on a foundation of complete corruption, manipulation and deceit, and most importantly ‘slavery’.
Lets take council tax as an example; council tax is a statutory instrument that came into force on 1st April 93. The statute that created this was the Local Government Finance Act 1992. This is a created legal document; a contract, a monetary contract that needs your consent!
Have you consented to this and if you did where did you sign?
When you do not pay you suffer a penalty, a forfeit by way of money, your goods or your liberty, surrendered as punishment for breach of contract.
How can this apply if you did not consent? Or did you without realising it? (More on this later)
Historians and constitutional experts will tell you that parliament was devised to give the people a voice, the house’s of representation, where the members are the representatives of the people, enacting laws on behalf of the people, under the mandate of the people, asserted by a general election, to the overall majority party winning the election.
Please look at the word: Mandate
1. An act by which one individual empowers another individual to conduct transactions for an individual in that person’s name.
2. From the very term of the definition, that the parties, should voluntarily intend to enter into the contract.
This is what the historians have been employed to do, to hide the real truth.
The members of parliament are a corporation registered on Dunn and Bradstreet: as a ‘for profit’ organisation. When you vote in an election all you do is elect new directors to head up this corporation. Please do not take my word for this check it out for yourselves. MP’s are basically salesmen working for the corporation and the one simple golden rule of salesmanship is to make the person you are selling too, believe, they need what you have for sale. This is over seen by the corporation advocates (lawyers, Barristers) to make sure the contracts are fulfilled on behalf of the corporation using the judiciary. One of these advocates was Tony Blair who became prime minister. Mr Blair studied law at ‘oxford’ before becoming a lawyer. Some of the directors are employed purposely as opposition to maintain the illusion of representation to make you ‘think’ the government work for you.
Political parties were designed to achieve this offering the MP’s everything they required to allow them to maintain, they will be in the socially dominant part of society. This is done with great ease relying on a simple weaknesses of human kind; greed. By using the egotistic, materialistic world, with their illusion of betterment within this world.
Hundreds of thousands of workers could lose their right to earn extra money working overtime after Brussels voted to scrap Britain’s opt-out from the 48-hour working week.
Labour Euro MPs defied Gordon Brown and backed the move to end our special deal on the issue.
The vote horrified business leaders, who say scrapping the right to work more than 48 hours a week would deal a devastating blow to Britain’s economy just as it enters a recession.
There will be something missing from Oxford’s Christmas lights display this year - any mention of Christmas.
Traditional themes are also being dumped in favour of a 25-metre high mobile of lanterns in the shape of the solar system.
Organisers say the new two-month WinterLight festival will include events marking the Hindu Diwali and Jewish Hannukah festivals as well as Christmas. It also coincides with the start of International Year of Astronomy 2009.
But religious leaders in the city condemned the change.
Sabir Hussain Mirza, chairman of the Muslim Council of Oxford, said: ‘I’m really upset. Christians, Muslims and other religions all look forward to Christmas.’
Rabbi Eli Bracknell of the Jewish Educational Centre said: ‘ Anything that waters down traditional culture and Christianity is not positive for the British identity. WinterLight includes all festivals but it also conceals them.’
Reverend James Grote, of the John Bunyan Baptist Church, said: ‘People are not offended by hearing each other’s faiths.’
But Ed Turner, deputy leader of Oxford council, said: ‘We are not Christmas killers. There’s no desire to downgrade its importance or prominence - there’s still going to be a Christmas tree.’
( Apparantly this has been organised by the “Oxford Inspire” charity which is the cultural arm of Oxford Council and sounds like a Common Purpose ‘Inspired’ sort of organisation and we all know how much Oxford has been infiltrated by Common purpose and it’s Cohorts)
If the world-wide trend continues, ‘Web 3.0′ will be tightly monitored, and will become an unprecedented tool for surveillance. The “Internet of Things”, a digital representation of real world objects and people tagged with RFID chips, and increased censorship are two main themes for the future of the web.
The future of the internet, according to author and “web critic” Andrew Keen, will be monitored by “gatekeepers” to verify the accuracy of information posted on the web. The “Outlook 2009″ report from the November-December issue of The Futurist reports that, “Internet entrepreneur Andrew Keen believes that the anonymity of today’s internet 2.0 will give way to a more open internet 3.0 in which third party gatekeepers monitor the information posted on Web sites to verify its accuracy.”
Keen stated during his early 2008 interview with The Futurist that the internet, in its current form, has undermined mainline media and empowered untrustworthy “amateurs”, two trends that he wants reversed. “Rather than the empowerment of the amateur, Web 3.0 will show the resurgence of the professional,” states Keen.
Australia has now joined China in implementing mandatory internet censorship, furthering the trend towards a locked down and monitored web.
In previous web-published articles I have examined evidence concerning the scientific evidential fraud behind NuLabour’s smoking ban. In this two-part article I will present evidence encompassing political fraud, deception and treason against the British people.
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG, counties along England’s south coast form the ‘Manche Region’ along with northern France. The ‘Atlantic Region’ takes in western England, along with Ireland, Wales and parts of Portugal, Spain, France and Scotland. Meanwhile eastern England is part of the ‘North Sea Region’, which covers areas of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, Norway and the Netherlands. The UK Government is fully behind the project, even though the words ‘England’ and ‘Britain’ are left off official maps of each area and the Manche Region renames the English Channel ‘The Channel Sea’.
Let us examine this announcement in a little more detail. The report also indicates that, Each region, which will be given taxpayers’ money to promote trade links, cultural ties, transport policies and tourism, is to be run by a ‘managing authority’ of unelected officials overseen by a director.“
By whose authority are these regions being established, may I ask?
We are then told that, “The regions have legal status and Manche has a budget of £261million between 2007 and 2013, Atlantic has £127million and North Sea has £219million.”
By whose authority did these regions derive their legal status? This project has already been comprehensively rejected in 2004 by the French and Dutch citizens in their referenda. Who has overridden the outcome of their democratic ballots?
A Conservative MP stated that, “The Labour Government has been caught red-handed conspiring with European bureaucrats to create a European superstate via the back door. Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe England off the map.”
Throughout the history of mankind, the elite have always fought for world empire. Now, using secrecy and international banking systems, they are making their final push for world government. Only an educated and informed public can stop them in their tracks.
‘Smokers could be completely banned from fostering children under controversial proposals branded health ‘fascism’ by opponents.
Redbridge in East London is believed to the first council in the country to consider a total ban on foster carers who smoke, no matter how old the child they want to look after.
It says the tough rules are needed to protect children from the effect of passive smoking, and to stop them taking up the habit from carers who they see as their role models.
But last night smokers have attacked the nanny state measure, saying it was unfair and being put forward by ‘health fascists’.
And fostering organisations said they did not believe occasional smokers should be banned, at a time when there is a national shortage of 10,000 foster carers.’
Tradesmen working for local authorities are to be asked to report signs of child abuse and neglect as they visit the homes of council tenants.
The plumbers, electricians and carpenters will be issued with a checklist of signs to look out for, including ‘unexplained bruising’ and ‘scalds’. Training will last just half a day.
But critics believe the use of workers untrained in such a highly complex field could backfire. They say that children who are at real risk could be overlooked because social workers with already bulging caseloads could be bombarded with baseless complaints.
One of the first councils to pilot the scheme will be Lincoln, which later this month is expected to approve the policy under which about 200 ‘front-line’ staff will be given four hours’ training on child abuse, with 600 backroom or office workers attending even shorter ‘awareness briefings’.
The front-liners include any employee who visits homes as part of his or her job, including rent officers. Council-employed sports coaches and leisure-centre staff, who come into daily contact with children, will also be trained.
Signs of physical abuse they are asked to look out for include ‘aggressive behaviour/severe temper outbursts, flinching when approached or touched and reluctance to get changed, eg, wearing long sleeves in hot weather’.
Signs of sexual abuse include ‘discomfort when walking or sitting down’ and ‘pregnancy’.
Social workers have cancelled a pre-arranged access meeting between a couple and the grandchildren they are trying to rescue from council care. Their decision follows revelations of the family’s plight in last week’s Mail on Sunday.
Graham and Gail Curlew received a letter on Monday – the day after we published their story – suspending the meeting with the children, a girl aged eight and a boy, six, that had been due to take place yesterday.
The letter, from Norfolk County Council, signed by Graham Wright, its area director for children’s services, criticised the Curlews, from Sheringham in Norfolk, for involving in the case their local MP, Liberal Democrat Norman Lamb, and journalist Anne Atkins, a family friend and who wrote last week’s report in this newspaper.
The council had originally ruled earlier this month that the couple would no longer be allowed to see their grandchildren. But that decision was rescinded at a meeting two weeks ago attended by the Curlews, Mr Lamb and Anne Atkins, where it was agreed they should be given access, albeit under the supervision of social workers.
Builder Mr Curlew, 53, and his wife Gail, a 48-year-old seamstress, are committed Salvation Army members who have long made it clear that they want to foster or adopt their grandchildren, who were taken into care because of the turbulent lives of their parents, the Curlews’ daughter Claire and her drug-addict partner. Instead, they have seen their access to the children steadily eroded by the council.
Entries (RSS)